心血管内科专业英语
心衰、冠心病与心律失常,学习射血分数、队列入选条件及心血管结局。
先通读并翻译整段,再核对译文,注意跨句指代、逻辑与条件。
共 2 条| 序号 | 英文原文 | 参考译文 | 方向 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 心血管内科 · 心力衰竭PLOS ONE 2024 · 原文完整 2 段 · 205 词 We assessed eligibility for omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) in a real-world cohort with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to the selection criteria of the GALACTIC-HF trial (trial scenario) and selected trial´s criteria more likely to impact real-world use (pragmatic scenario). We included 31,015 patients with HFrEF lasting ≥3 months and registered in the Swedish HF registry between 2000–2021. Trial eligibility was calculated by applying all the GALACTIC-HF selection criteria. The pragmatic scenario considered only the New York Heart Association class, history of worsening HF, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP), blood pressure and renal failure criteria defined as in the trial. Eligibility for OM in chronic HFrEF was 21% and 36% in the trial and pragmatic scenarios, respectively. Eligibility was higher in those with EF<30% (trial: 27%, pragmatic: 44%), in-patients (trial:30%, pragmatic:57%), severe HF (trial: 35%, pragmatic: 60%), NYHA class III-IV (trial: 26%, pragmatic: 45%), and NT-proBNP≥5,000pg/mL (trial: 30%, pragmatic: 51%). The criteria that most limited eligibility were history of a recent worsening HF event (60% eligible in chronic HFrEF), elevated NT-proBNP (82% eligible), and deviating blood pressure (82% eligible). Overall, eligible patients were characterized by more severe HF and higher CV event-rates in both scenarios, and higher comorbidity burden in the pragmatic scenario. Eligibility for omecamtiv mecarbil in a real-world heart failure population: Data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry ↗Felix Lindberg; Natanael Øigaard; Marco Metra; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Ulf Dahlström; Peter Mol; Camilla Hage; Lars H Lund; Gianluigi Savarese · Abstract · 连续前两段(保留完整原文段落)CC BY 4.0 · 本站添加中文翻译 | 我们在一个射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)真实世界队列中,分别依据 GALACTIC-HF 试验的入选标准(试验情境),以及从中选取的、更可能影响真实世界应用的试验标准(务实情境),评估患者使用 omecamtiv mecarbil(OM)的资格。 我们纳入了 31,015 例射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)持续至少 3 个月、于 2000—2021 年登记在瑞典心力衰竭注册数据库中的患者。应用 GALACTIC-HF 的全部筛选标准计算试验入选资格。务实情境仅考虑试验所定义的纽约心脏病协会心功能分级、心衰恶化史、N 末端 B 型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)、血压和肾衰竭标准。慢性 HFrEF 患者在试验情境和务实情境下符合 OM 使用资格的比例分别为 21% 和 36%。在射血分数低于 30%(试验:27%,务实:44%)、住院(30%,57%)、重度心衰(35%,60%)、NYHA III~IV 级(26%,45%)和 NT-proBNP≥5,000 pg/mL(30%,51%)的患者中,符合资格的比例更高。限制资格最多的标准是近期心衰恶化事件史(慢性 HFrEF 患者中 60% 符合)、NT-proBNP 升高(82% 符合)及血压偏离规定范围(82% 符合)。总体而言,两种情境下符合资格的患者均具有心衰更严重、心血管事件发生率更高的特征;务实情境下,其共病负担也更重。 词组与句法首段描述入选资格评估,不是药物疗效比较。trial scenario 与 pragmatic scenario 指不同标准情境,不能据此给个体患者作用药推荐。 | 心血管内科 |
| 2 | 队列研究 · 心血管—肾脏—代谢综合征PLOS Medicine 2025 · 原文完整 3 段 · 400 词 Background: The American Heart Association recently issued guidelines introducing the concept of cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic (CKM) syndrome to emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to prevention, risk stratification, and treatment for these diseases. This study assessed the prevalence of CKM syndrome stages and the mortality risk associated with its components in a large Asian cohort. Methods and findings: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 515,602 participants aged ≥20 years from a health screening program conducted between 1996 and 2017 in Taiwan. We assessed the associations of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, and cause-specific mortality with CKM stages and its components—hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (CKD), metabolic syndrome, and hyperlipidemia. All participants were followed for a median of 16.5 years (interquartile range: 11.5, 21.2 years). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, sex, educational level, smoking status, alcohol drinking status, and physical activity groups, were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs). We used Chiang’s life table method to estimate years of life lost due to each CKM component. Among all participants, 257,535 (49.9%) were female. The majority of participants ( n = 368,578 participants, (71.5%)) met criteria for CKM syndrome, with prevalence rates of 19.5%, 46.3%, 1.9%, and 3.8% for stages 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. CKM syndrome was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.33; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.28, 1.39), CVD mortality (HR: 2.81; 95% CI: 2.45, 3.22), and incident end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) (HR: 10.15; 95% CI: 7.54, 13.67). Each additional CKM component was associated with a 22% increase in the risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.21, 1.23), a 37% increase in the risk of CVD mortality (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.35, 1.40) compared with those without any CKM components. In addition, each additional component reduced average life expectancy by 3 years. The population-attributable fractions of CKM syndrome were 18.7% (95% CI: 15.8, 21.7) for all-cause mortality and 55.0% (95% CI: 49.0, 60.4) for CVD mortality. We estimated that failing to include CKD in CKM syndrome could result in the missed attribution of 11% of CVD deaths. The primary limitation is that our analysis relied on baseline measurements only, without accounting for longitudinal changes. Conclusions: In the large cohort study, the prevalence of CKM syndrome and its components were associated with risks of all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, and ESKD. These findings highlight the clinical need for integrated care within CKM health. Cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic syndrome and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: A retrospective cohort study ↗Min-Kuang Tsai; Juliana Tze-Wah Kao; Chung-Shun Wong; Chia-Te Liao; Wei-Cheng Lo; Kuo-Liong Chien; Chi-Pang Wen; Mai-Szu Wu; Mei-Yi Wu · Abstract · 完整摘要,保留分节标题CC BY 4.0 · 本站添加中文翻译 | 背景:美国心脏协会近期发布指南,引入心血管—肾脏—代谢(CKM)综合征的概念,强调以多学科方法开展这些疾病的预防、风险分层与治疗的重要性。本研究在一个大型亚洲队列中,评估了 CKM 综合征各分期的患病率及其组分相关的死亡风险。 方法与发现:我们分析了一个回顾性队列,包括 1996—2017 年在台湾参加健康筛查项目的 515,602 名年龄不低于 20 岁的参与者。我们评估了全因死亡、心血管疾病(CVD)死亡及特定死因死亡与 CKM 分期及其组分——高血压、糖尿病、慢性肾脏病(CKD)、代谢综合征和高脂血症——之间的关联。所有参与者的中位随访时间为 16.5 年(四分位距:11.5~21.2 年)。采用调整了年龄、性别、教育程度、吸烟状况、饮酒状况和体力活动分组的多变量 Cox 比例风险模型计算风险比(HR)。采用 Chiang 寿命表法估计各 CKM 组分所致的寿命损失年数。所有参与者中,257,535 人(49.9%)为女性。多数参与者(368,578 人,71.5%)符合 CKM 综合征标准,1、2、3、4 期的患病率分别为 19.5%、46.3%、1.9% 和 3.8%。CKM 综合征与较高的全因死亡风险(HR:1.33;95% 置信区间 CI:1.28~1.39)、CVD 死亡风险(HR:2.81;95% CI:2.45~3.22)及新发终末期肾脏病(ESKD)风险(HR:10.15;95% CI:7.54~13.67)相关。与没有任何 CKM 组分者相比,每增加一个 CKM 组分,与全因死亡风险增加 22%(HR:1.22;95% CI:1.21~1.23)、CVD 死亡风险增加 37%(HR:1.37;95% CI:1.35~1.40)相关。此外,作者估计每增加一个组分,平均预期寿命减少 3 年。CKM 综合征对全因死亡和 CVD 死亡的人群归因分值分别为 18.7%(95% CI:15.8~21.7)和 55.0%(95% CI:49.0~60.4)。我们估计,若未将 CKD 纳入 CKM 综合征,可能遗漏对 11% 的 CVD 死亡的归因。本研究的主要局限在于分析仅依赖基线测量,未考虑随时间发生的变化。 结论:在这项大型队列研究中,CKM 综合征及其组分的患病情况与全因死亡、CVD 死亡和 ESKD 风险相关。这些发现突出表明,临床上需要对 CKM 健康开展整合式照护。 词组与句法CKM 为心血管—肾脏—代谢综合征;HR 比较瞬时风险。科研追问:71.5% 能代表所有亚洲人群吗?参考要点:这是该健康筛查队列中的比例;研究为观察性设计,不能把关联直接译成因果。寿命损失为模型估计,PAF 解释为可预防比例需要因果假设。 | 心血管内科 |